**

EU Parliament Negotiator Proposes Further Dilution of CSRD and CSDDD: A Blow to ESG Ambitions?

The European Union's ambitious plans for bolstering Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are facing a significant setback. Recent proposals by the lead negotiator for the European Parliament's omnibus directive suggest a potential watering down of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), sparking outrage amongst environmental and social advocates. This move represents a considerable challenge to the EU's commitment to achieving its ambitious Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) goals and raises concerns about the efficacy of future corporate sustainability efforts. The implications for businesses, investors, and the environment are far-reaching and demand careful consideration.

Understanding the CSRD and CSDDD:

Before delving into the specifics of the proposed changes, let's briefly revisit the core objectives of the CSRD and CSDDD. These directives represent a landmark shift in the EU's regulatory landscape, aiming to enhance transparency and accountability in corporate sustainability practices.

• CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive): This directive expands the scope of mandatory sustainability reporting, significantly increasing the number of companies required to disclose Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information. The aim is to provide investors and stakeholders with more comprehensive and reliable data on a company's environmental and social impact. This includes reporting on climate change, pollution, human rights, and diversity. Keywords: CSRD reporting, mandatory ESG reporting, EU sustainability reporting, non-financial reporting.

• CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive): This directive holds companies accountable for their entire value chain, requiring them to identify, prevent, and mitigate adverse impacts on human rights and the environment. It introduces due diligence obligations across the supply chain, pushing companies to actively address ESG risks within their operations and those of their suppliers. Keywords: CSDDD due diligence, supply chain sustainability, human rights due diligence, environmental due diligence, ESG risk management.

The Proposed Dilution: A Step Backwards for ESG?

The omnibus directive, currently under negotiation, encompasses a range of legislative proposals. However, the lead negotiator's proposed amendments to the CSRD and CSDDD have raised significant alarm. Critics argue these changes significantly weaken the directives' impact, potentially undermining their effectiveness.

• Weakening of mandatory disclosures: Reports suggest proposals to reduce the scope of mandatory disclosures under the CSRD, potentially allowing companies to avoid reporting on certain critical ESG metrics. This could lead to a significant reduction in transparency and the availability of reliable ESG data for investors.

• Reduced due diligence requirements: Similarly, concerns have been raised about the proposed weakening of due diligence obligations under the CSDDD. A less stringent framework could allow companies to avoid their responsibility for addressing human rights and environmental issues throughout their value chains. Keywords: ESG disclosure requirements, corporate transparency, sustainable finance, greenwashing.

• Delaying implementation: Some proposals suggest delaying the implementation of certain aspects of both directives, further hindering their impact and potentially allowing companies more time to adjust to the new regulations in a way that may prioritize profits over sustainability.

The Implications for Businesses and Investors:

These proposed changes carry significant implications for both businesses and investors. A watered-down regulatory framework could:

• Increase greenwashing: Weakened reporting requirements may embolden companies to engage in greenwashing, making it harder for investors to assess their true ESG performance.

• Reduce investor confidence: Lack of reliable and comprehensive ESG data could decrease investor confidence and lead to reduced capital flows towards companies with strong sustainability profiles.

• Hinder sustainable investments: The weakened directives may significantly slow down the growth of the sustainable finance market, impacting the EU's ability to attract green investments.

The Wider Environmental and Social Impact:

The potential impact extends beyond the financial sphere. A less stringent regulatory framework could:

• Delay climate action: Reduced transparency and accountability could hamper efforts to mitigate climate change and achieve the EU's ambitious climate targets.

• Exacerbate social inequalities: Weakened due diligence obligations could lead to the continued exploitation of workers and communities in global supply chains.

• Undermine environmental protection: Relaxing environmental standards could result in increased pollution and environmental damage.

What Happens Next?

The fate of these proposed amendments remains uncertain. The European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission will need to reach an agreement on the final text of the omnibus directive. Environmental and social NGOs are expected to intensify their lobbying efforts to prevent the dilution of the CSRD and CSDDD. The outcome will significantly impact the EU's capacity to lead the global transition towards a more sustainable and responsible economy. Keywords: EU legislation, ESG regulation, political lobbying, sustainable development goals (SDGs). The ongoing debate underscores the importance of robust and effective ESG regulation for achieving meaningful progress towards a more sustainable future. The coming weeks and months will be crucial in determining the ultimate success or failure of the EU's ambitious sustainability agenda. The watchful eye of investors and civil society will be crucial in ensuring that the final legislation truly reflects the EU's stated commitment to corporate sustainability.