**

The UK stock market is languishing, prompting calls for drastic action from leading financial figures. A growing chorus of voices, including prominent economists and industry leaders, is urging Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to abolish stamp duty on shares to reinvigorate trading and attract much-needed investment. This move, they argue, is crucial to revitalizing the UK economy and bolstering investor confidence in a post-Brexit, post-pandemic landscape. The debate centers around whether scrapping this tax, which currently adds a significant cost to share transactions, is the right prescription for the ailing FTSE 100 and broader UK market performance.

The Case for Abolishing Stamp Duty on Shares

The argument for abolishing stamp duty on shares rests on several key pillars:

Increased Trading Volume and Market Liquidity

Proponents contend that removing the tax would immediately boost trading volume. The current stamp duty levy acts as a disincentive, particularly for smaller investors and higher-frequency trading. Eliminating this friction could unlock significant pent-up demand, leading to a more liquid and efficient market. Increased liquidity is a key factor in attracting foreign investment, which the UK desperately needs to fund economic growth. This is especially relevant given the current global economic uncertainty and the ongoing impact of inflation on UK consumer spending and business confidence.

Attracting Foreign Investment

A vibrant and efficient stock market is crucial for attracting foreign investment. Many international investors actively seek markets with low transaction costs. By removing stamp duty, the UK could position itself as a more competitive investment destination compared to other major global financial centers. This increased foreign capital inflow could inject much-needed funds into British businesses, supporting job creation and stimulating economic growth. The current level of UK investment compared to other developed nations has come under heavy scrutiny in recent months.

Supporting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

SMEs are the backbone of the UK economy, yet accessing capital remains a significant challenge. Reducing the cost of trading shares could significantly benefit SMEs seeking to raise capital through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) or other equity financing methods. Lower costs associated with listing on the stock exchange could stimulate entrepreneurial activity and support the growth of innovative businesses. This is particularly crucial in sectors like green technology and biotechnology, where access to finance is often a critical constraint.

Boosting Pension Funds and Retail Investor Participation

Many individuals invest in the stock market through pension funds and individual savings accounts (ISAs). Removing stamp duty could make these investments more attractive, potentially leading to increased participation and long-term wealth creation. Increased participation in the stock market is vital for a healthy, well-functioning financial ecosystem.

The Counterarguments: Concerns and Potential Drawbacks

While the arguments in favor of abolishing stamp duty are compelling, there are counterarguments to consider:

Revenue Loss for the Treasury

The most obvious concern is the potential loss of revenue for the UK Treasury. Stamp duty on shares generates a considerable amount of income each year. Abolishing the tax would require finding alternative revenue streams or making cuts elsewhere in government spending, potentially leading to difficult political choices. The government will have to carefully weigh the potential long-term economic benefits against the immediate loss of tax revenue.

Potential for Market Volatility

Some argue that removing stamp duty could lead to increased market volatility. While increased trading volume is generally positive, it could also amplify short-term price swings, potentially harming less sophisticated investors. This requires careful consideration and potentially robust regulatory measures to mitigate such risks.

Impact on Other Taxes

The potential abolition of stamp duty raises questions about the broader tax system. Should other transaction taxes be reformed in tandem to maintain a balanced approach to fiscal policy? Any change to stamp duty would need to be considered within the wider context of UK tax legislation to avoid unintended consequences.

Conclusion: A Necessary Gamble or a Reckless Risk?

The decision to abolish stamp duty on shares is a complex one, balancing potential long-term economic benefits with immediate revenue concerns. The potential for increased market liquidity, foreign investment, and SME growth is significant. However, the impact on government finances and potential market volatility must be carefully assessed. The Chancellor faces a challenging dilemma, needing to weigh the potential for a short-term financial hit against the possibility of a significant long-term boost to the UK economy and the broader financial market. The debate surrounding stamp duty and its impact on the UK stock market is far from over, and the coming months will likely see further discussion and potential policy changes. This includes consideration of alternative measures to stimulate the UK stock market, such as targeted tax breaks for specific sectors or incentives for long-term investment. The future of the UK stock market hangs in the balance.